Elmar's Re-application

Steam Name: Success Kid

Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:37843346

In-game name(s): Elmar J Fap, Elmar, Elmar F,Elmar Johnson

Age: 16 ( i don't sound 16)

How long have you been playing on Illusion Gaming RP?: 4 weeks, first week not so much but since then I've been on here a lot.

Total Time Spent on Garry's Mod: 3325hrs

Roughly how long a day can you spend on the server?: Non school days: roughly 8hrs, School: 3-4hrs

Why do you want to be a moderator for our server?: I know i made some bad decisions, such as killing too many people, since then, I've been trying not to. And i have learned my lesson from FailRPing when barely anyone is on, from now on i will never break rules under any circumstance, i just assumed it was allowed and I'm sorry, i don't think anyone thought i was a bad mod, no one ever told me i was. Plus i'm usually on at night and people tend to break rules at that time. I could help out with that.

Give us an example of how you would deal with a rule-breaker:

If a person was propblocking, i would tell him it is propblock and explain how to make fadeing doors etc. If he doesnt keypad it or makes a fake keypad, i would ask him one more time to fix it or it would be a kick.

If a guy was racist/sexist/ offending others i would ask him to stop, if he ignores me and carrys on i would mute him (if i could) and ask him again i would get his attention, if failing to stop would lead to a freeze and slay or jail for 1 minute and kick if he continues

If someone was propkilling, i would freeze/jail him, call for admin, if there isn't a admin, get his steamid and proof he did propkill and post a ban request.

Neutral. There was a massive controversy earlier between him and a few people and I didn't know who to believe.

+1 Seen him do good RP.

Bassman274 wrote:Neutral. There was a massive controversy earlier between him and a few people and I didn't know who to believe.

If this is about the mayor thing, i just didn't believe he could make me wanted for lies and get me arrested.

-1 you made a ban request on me ! that said that im a SCAMMER ! and i didnt scam !

-1

-0.5 when i was on you, you seemed to slay straight away rather than freeze or jail

1+ During the few weeks he was demoted. He has helped me out
Also he is one of the members of staff that stay on server all day. Sometimes at night its just me.
He used to stay on with me and help a night. So I think he deserves another chance.

MrRadicalz wrote:-1 you made a ban request on me ! that said that im a SCAMMER ! and i didnt scam !

You said you was SELLING these props, you didn't say you was giving them out, that's why i posted one, if you stated they were free i wouldn't of done.

I'm sorry, i thought you was selling props.

Fulcrum wrote:-1

Is there a reason with that?

Felor Metlock wrote:-0.5 when i was on you, you seemed to slay straight away rather than freeze or jail

I got told about that and i stopped doing it.

+1 He really changed ever since, never broke a rule.
@bassman274 mayor was clam, kept disrespecting and fail-rping.

-1

+1 Good Rp er

jaktens tid wrote:-1

Yet again, you should have a reason.

Elmar Johnson wrote:

jaktens tid wrote:-1

Yet again, you should have a reason.

my demote request said it all

jaktens tid wrote:

Elmar Johnson wrote:

jaktens tid wrote:-1

Yet again, you should have a reason.

my demote request said it all

You didn't post one on me . .

My reason for the -1

The self supplying a thief using swat weps (forgivable imo)
After getting raided you put a building sign outside your base then called admin and accused me and my gang of raiding while building.

Previously had a MASSIVE score from killing people. Currently 70. You repeatedly suicide to get this score down an admin recently mentioned you should stop suicide (tho his reason was rp). In 1 session you had -20 something score (20 + number of kills deaths) Not only do you kill alot of people but you try to cover it up using repeated suicide to lower your score. Sorry but that warrants a -1 from me.

Fulcrum wrote:My reason for the -1

The self supplying a thief using swat weps (forgivable imo)
After getting raided you put a building sign outside your base then called admin and accused me and my gang of raiding while building.

Previously had a MASSIVE score from killing people. Currently 70. You repeatedly suicide to get this score down an  admin recently mentioned you should stop suicide (tho his reason was rp). In 1 session you had -20 something score (20 + number of kills deaths) Not only do you kill alot of people but you try to cover it up using repeated suicide to lower your score. Sorry but that warrants a -1 from me.

No i had a building sign up, your guys then kill my bmd and gina. Then one of them kills Rodney when he deals with it.

-1, what fulcrum said.

Fulcrum wrote:My reason for the -1

The self supplying a thief using swat weps (forgivable imo)
After getting raided you put a building sign outside your base then called admin and accused me and my gang of raiding while building.

Previously had a MASSIVE score from killing people. Currently 70. You repeatedly suicide to get this score down an  admin recently mentioned you should stop suicide (tho his reason was rp). In 1 session you had -20 something score (20 + number of kills deaths) Not only do you kill alot of people but you try to cover it up using repeated suicide to lower your score. Sorry but that warrants a -1 from me.

Also i did not job abuse, i bought the weapons, no admin found me /drop ing it, so i didn't do it. I already told you 3 times that i didn't drop them.

Idk if my opinion counts all that much but i'm Neutral here. He seems like an awesome guy , able to RP and follows the rules , but i wasn't around when all this killing stuff was going down. I think he might make a good mod if given a chance again but i'm still neutral

Neutral. Controversy between other players and staff means obvious trust issues. Staff needs to be trusted by the community, this is essential.

T. Bowman wrote:Neutral. Controversy between other players and staff means obvious trust issues. Staff needs to be trusted by the community, this is essential.

What controversy?

Elmar Johnson wrote:

T. Bowman wrote:Neutral. Controversy between other players and staff means obvious trust issues. Staff needs to be trusted by the community, this is essential.

What controversy?

All the earlier controversy.

-1. I saw you moderate, you actually dealt with one of my buddies and you didnt do it well, Imo. you arent a good moderator, and you seem very immature.

Memphis Raines wrote:-1. I saw you moderate, you actually dealt with one of my buddies and you didnt do it well, Imo. you arent a good moderator, and you seem very immature.

What happened.